Take our free, 5-minute substance use self-assessment below if you think you or someone you love might be struggling with substance use. The evaluation consists of 11 yes or no questions that are intended to be used as an informational tool to assess the severity and probability of a substance use disorder. The test is free, confidential, and no personal information is needed to receive the result. It’s not an easy road to lasting recovery, but with the right support and resources, it can definitely be a journey worth taking.

What Are the Signs of Addiction?

You don’t have to attend AA meetings and introduce yourself as an alcoholic, and you don’t have to answer questions at parties or social gatherings when people notice you aren’t drinking. Multivariable stepwise regressions (Table2) show that younger individuals were significantly more likely to benon-abstinent, and movement to the next oldest age category reduced the odds ofnon-abstinence by an average of 27%. Importantly, the confidence intervals were narrow andextremely similar across models, implying that the effect of age was robust to modelspecification.

A flight from evidence-based practice?

controlled drinking vs abstinence

Witkiewitz also arguedthat the commonly held belief that abstinence is the only solution may deter someindividuals from seeking help. Miller et al. (in press) found that more dependent drinkers were less likely to achieve CD outcomes but that desired treatment goal and whether one labeled oneself an alcoholic or not independently predicted outcome type. The results suggest that the 12-step philosophy, with abstinence as the only possible choice, might mean that people in the AA community who are ambivalent and/or critical regarding parts of the philosophy must “hide” their perceptions on their own process.

3 Stepwise regressions: Non-abstinence

Nordström and Berglund, like Wallace et al. (1988), selected high-prognosis patients who were socially stable. The Wallace et al. patients had a high level of abstinence; patients in Nordström and Berglund had a high level of controlled drinking. Social stability at intake was negatively related in Rychtarik et al. to consumption as a result either of abstinence or of limited intake.

By extension, for all those treated for alcohol abuse, including those with no dependence symptoms, moderation of drinking (termed controlled drinking or CD) as a goal of treatment is rejected (Peele, 1992). Instead, providers claim, holding out such a goal to an alcoholic is detrimental, fostering a continuation of denial and delaying the alcoholic’s need to accept the reality that he or she can never drink in moderation. The dearth of data regarding individuals in long-term recovery highlights theneed to examine a sample that includes individuals with several years of recoveryexperience. Moreover, although previous studies have examined treated, non-treated andgeneral population samples, none has focused on individuals who identifythemselves as “in recovery” from alcohol problems. In addition, some might consider abstinence as a necessary part of therecovery process, while others might not. The following six questions explore the value, prevalence, and clinical impact of controlled drinking vs. abstinence outcomes in alcoholism treatment; they are intended to argue the case for controlled drinking as a reasonable and realistic goal.

This method focuses on dealing with the root causes of the symptoms, leading to better long-term results for both mental health and substance use. The role of nutrition should also not be overlooked as maintaining a balanced diet can help restore physical health damaged by excessive alcohol consumption. Controlled drinking is not appropriate for individuals with severe AUD or those with certain medical conditions exacerbated by alcohol use.

What is Controlled Drinking or Alcohol Moderation Management?

This approach underestimates the compulsive nature of addiction and the neurological changes that occur with prolonged alcohol misuse. For individuals with severe alcohol dependence, abstinence remains the most effective and safe strategy to avoid the devastating consequences of alcohol-related health issues, social disruption, and the potential for relapse. Controlled drinking, often advocated as a moderation approach for people with alcohol use disorders, can be highly problematic and unsuitable for those who truly suffer from alcohol addiction. Alcoholism is characterised by a loss of control over one’s drinking behaviour and an inability to consistently limit consumption. Attempting controlled drinking in such cases often reinforces the addictive cycle rather than breaking it.

  • A considerable number of clients reported changed views on the programme, some were still abstinent and some were drinking in a controlled way.
  • Some no longer attended meetings but remained abstinent with a positive view of the 12-step programme.
  • Study (WIR) dataset, one of the largest repositoriesof individuals in recovery available.
  • WIR is alsocross-sectional by design, though it did include questions about lifetime drug and alcoholuse.
  • Our team at CATCH strongly believes in holistic healing methods as part of this process.
  • Also, defining sobriety as a further/deeper step in the recovery process offers a potential for 12-step participants to focus on new goals and getting involved in new groups, not primarily bound by recovery goals.

For these clients, the recovery process, aiming to reach sustained recovery in the broader sense covering parts of their lives A Guide To Sober House Rules: What You Need To Know other than the SUD, was in part at odds with the ongoing participation in AA. These results indicate that strict views on abstinence and the nature of alcohol problems in 12-step-based treatment, and AA philosophy may create problems for the recovery process. Previous studies suggests that these strict views might prevent people from seeking treatment (Keyes et al., 2010; Wallhed Finn et al., 2014). The present study indicates that the strict views in AA also might prevent clients in AA to seek help and support elsewhere, since they percieve that this conflicts with the AA philosophy (Klingemann and Klingemann, 2017). Initially, AA was not intended to offer a professional programme model for treatment (Alcoholics Anonymous, 2011). When the premise of AA was transformed into the 12-step treatment programme, it was performed in a professional setting.

controlled drinking vs abstinence

Thus https://thecinnamonhollow.com/a-guide-to-sober-house-rules-what-you-need-to-know/ relying on DSM criteria to define a sample of individuals in recovery mayunintentionally exclude individuals who are engaging in non-abstinent or harm reductiontechniques and making positive changes in their lives. While you may see the appeal in a programme that allows for some level of drink intake, it’s crucial to consider the potential drawbacks that could come with this approach. Even moderate drinking can lead to long-term health problems such as liver disease, heart disease, and increased risk of certain cancers. Besides, alcohol affects your sleep quality and mental health too; it’s not uncommon for people who drink regularly to struggle with anxiety or depression. Some clients expressed a need for other or complementary support from professionals, whereas others highlighted the importance of leaving the 12-step community to be able to work on other parts of their lives. The descriptions on how the tools from treatment were initially used to deal with SUD and were later used to deal with other problems in the lives of IPs can be put in relation to the differentiation between abstinence and sobriety suggested by Helm (2019).

1 What Is Recovery? study

Your sobriety journey is personal, and what works best for you may not work as well for someone else. However, studies have shown that abstinence often yields more benefits in the long run. For instance, abstaining from alcohol can decrease the risk of liver disease, improve cognitive function, and enhance emotional resilience. Cultural perspectives on alcohol also influence our attitudes towards its use and misuse, shaping norms around what constitutes acceptable levels of consumption. While some cultures romanticise heavy drinking others promote temperance; being aware of these cultural influences can aid in reshaping your own relationship with alcohol and eliminate harmful drinking patterns. Whether you’re considering moderation or complete abstinence, this article will provide information about how to begin an Alcohol Moderation Management (AMM), its effectiveness, potential drawbacks, and its applicability to people dealing with alcoholism.

  • For people suffering from alcohol use disorders, trying to moderate drinking isn’t advised and total abstinence is always recommended.
  • On the other hand, as the group expressed positive views on this specific treatment, they might question the sobriety goal in a lesser extent than other groups.
  • Professional treatment can give anyone battling addiction the tools needed to stay sober in the face of life’s challenges.
  • This method focuses on dealing with the root causes of the symptoms, leading to better long-term results for both mental health and substance use.
  • Controlled-drinking therapy is widely available in Europe, however, and some in the United States argue that controlled drinking is in fact a reasonable and realistic goal.

Remember that if controlled drinking proves challenging or ineffective, abstinence-based approaches are always available and may be the safer, more effective option for many individuals struggling with alcohol use problems. Some no longer attended meetings but remained abstinent with a positive view of the 12-step programme. Those clients described meetings as helpful at the beginning of their recovery process. However, they no longer found themselves in need of this help and did not express ambivalence regarding their decision to stop attending meetings. On the other hand, some clients in the present study had adopted the 12-step principles, intensified their attendance and made it more or less central in their life. In the present follow-up, the recovery process for clients previously treated for SUD was investigated, focusing on abstinence and CD.